This extraordinary work of investigative journalism takes readers inside America’s isolated Mormon Fundamentalist communities, where some In his bestselling books Into Thin Air and Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer explored the In the prologue to Under the Banner of Heaven, Krakauer asks of the brutal. Under the Banner of Heaven has ratings and reviews. Jon Krakauer’s literary reputation rests on insightful chronicles of lives conducted at the.
|Published (Last):||2 October 2016|
|PDF File Size:||9.31 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.52 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
There are two routes to this. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Is this a fair and accurate statement? Have Mormons been more often the perpetrators or the victims of violence? This is a good question, one that again forces us to look critically at what revelation is, how it comes, and how it is to be evaluated.
Under the Banner of Heaven Reader’s Guide
At the core of his book is an appalling double murder committed by two Mormon Fundamentalist brothers, Ron and Dan Lafferty, who insist they received a revelation from God commanding them to kill their blameless victims. I’d certainly get a lot more done. There are within the Church ways of dealing with schisms or apostasy, just as there were in New Testament times 1 Corinthians 1: Krakauer also describes how the fundamentalist Mormons view the U.
And part of that argument is arguing that these totally absurd and violent beliefs are really just as rational as any other religious person’s beliefs. The issue of what constitutes valid revelation from God somebody explain to me why God finds it necessary to speak in 15th century English.
As with all Karakauer books, its very well-written in quite a journalistic style and is well worth a read even if you totally disagree with my interpretation of it. One wonders just what the author hoped to accomplish in writing this book.
And for that reason, this book was a difficult read for me. Under the Banner of Heaven suffers from an extremely unhealthy and unworkable overgeneralization. What I have some trouble with is: The trial of the Laffertys provides an excellent case to show how the mental health profession defines “crazy” and “delusional” in a way that could technically be used to diagnose all religious people as crazy; but of course, we define only some groups as crazy for their religious beliefs.
Later, in prison, when Ron hears the voice of God now commanding him to kill his brother, that also makes psychological sense.
Church Response to Jon Krakauer’s Under the Banner of Heaven
And it seems pretty pathetic when our president makes it his duty to prevent homosexual marriage from ever being considered, even though homosexuality is a genetic predisposition and is what you simply are, while in Utah there are groups doing what I said above and millions of people worry that it is the homosexuals who risk destroying the sanctity of marriage. In that sense, this book is an unfortunate endeavor, for it fosters unnecessary suspicion and exclusion in a world that desperately needs openness and understanding.
Why not, say, a burning acacia krakaeur That said, I also did not appreciate the tone with which Krakauer referred to Joseph Smith. This man murdered his sister-in-law!
This faith in the divine revelation of the will of God, which put Joseph Smith and the early Mormon church at odds with earthly authorities, would later inspire fundamentalists like Dan and Ron Lafferty to commit what they felt to be justified murders. These religions are completely separate in all but their initial history. Which is sad, because while an interesting and informational read, there wasn’t much else to the book until the end when this problem was presented.
How should Joseph Smith be understood: Turleymanaging director of the Church History Department of the LDS Church, argued that the book contained mistakes and incorrect assertions. Turley, managing director of the Family and Church History Department and an authority on Church history and doctrine.
I’ve seen, here in the West Indies, how a cult can gain both the practice and the legitimacy of an established religion within a few generations. I think those who don’t believe, like Krakauer himself, find it awfully easy to find fault with faith, with religion, because they focus and magnify the imperfections of man. This book is oh, so totally not it. During Ron’s trial, the prosecution works hard to make the case that Ron, despite his history of hearing voices and his belief that an evil spirit is trying to enter his body through his anus, is mentally competent to stand trial.
How awful is that, to believe that you must share your husband with other women, because for men of the Mormon faith, women are just child bearers, nothing more. He married her when he was thirty-eight. Is bringing children up ‘in’ Mormonism any more antithetical to critical thought than bringing them up ‘in’ any other religion?
Such a person is not, however, permitted to continue to fight the Church, stir discontent and sow discord among the Saints under the cloak of membership. The Church of Latter Day Saints continues to do this uon some degree today, and the fundamentalists especially, thriving on it.
Under the Banner of Heaven
Read it Forward Read it first. Want to Read saving…. He’s writing about a subject where family tends to get a little twisted.
In the absence of any rational reason for believing in one version of the supernatural as opposed to another, it is indeed difficult to argue that one belief system is insane, while another deserves to be endorsed by nearly every candidate for the president of the United States. Both Abraham and Jacob took additional wives Genesis So why another one?
It will boil your blood and make you think. This book is not history, and Krakauer is no historian. All religions have some history and beliefs that don’t holdup well under the scrutiny of twenty-first century sensibilities. If you’re a man, that is. He probably chose to write a controversial book to examine these important issues, to prompt people to think, and to hope that if enough people read it and learn history, history will not be repeated, because people can choose to think about this problem and choose to figure out bannner it happens, so that change can be affected so that issues of religion-related violence will become less common.
The letter is clear on its face, though some writers, anxious to prove a circumstantial case against Tje Young, try to make no mean yes by asserting that the order not to attack the train was really just the opposite.